Items /Ring of the Gathering Storm
Item · Armor · Item Level 65 changed

Ring of the Gathering Storm

On Forever, Ring of the Gathering Storm differs from Classic Era 1.15.9.69722 in 2 fields: effects, stats. Both sides are shown below, verbatim, not graded.

Classic Era vs Forever

The same tooltip players see in-game, side by side, with each changed line marked.

Classic Era 1.15.9.69722
Ring of the Gathering Storm
Item Level 65
Binds when picked up
Finger · Armor
+8 Strength
+9 Agility
+11 Intellect
+10 Stamina
Requires Level 60
Equip: Increase Spell Dam 12
Forever 1.60.1.69876
Ring of the Gathering Storm
Item Level 65
Binds when picked up
Finger · Armor
Strength (stat budget 2963) · recorded differently
Agility (stat budget 3333) · recorded differently
Intellect (stat budget 4074) · recorded differently
Stamina (stat budget 3704) · recorded differently
Spell Power (stat budget 4444)
A stat marked recorded differently is stored as a flat amount by one client and as a stat percent editor value by the other (which that client computes at runtime from item level curves not in these tables). The two are not directly comparable, so one side's number is not a higher or lower version of the other.
Requires Level 60
Equip: Increase Spell Dam 12
changed value added in Forever removed in Forever
Raw field diff every changed column, verbatim
Field Classic Era Forever
effects [ { "charges": 0, "cooldownMs": -1, "spellId": 9417, "spellName": "Increase Spell Dam 12", "trigger": 1 } ] []
stats [ { "amount": 8, "stat": 4 }, { "amount": 9, "stat": 3 }, { "amount": 11, "stat": 5 }, { "amount": 10, "stat": 7 } ] [ { "percentEditor": 2963, "stat": 4 }, { "percentEditor": 3333, "stat": 3 }, { "percentEditor": 4074, "stat": 5 }, { "percentEditor": 3704, "stat": 7 }, { "percentEditor": 4444, "stat": 45 } ]

History

Build Compared to Change
1.60.1.69876 1.15.9.69722 2 fields

Related

See every changed record in 1.60.1.69876 →

Read verbatim from build 1.60.1.69876 , compared against Classic Era 1.15.9.69722·synced Sep 16, 2026·how we read this →